FieldHockeyCorner.com

2006 Ratings as of November 19, 1:45 pm
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 3

South Atlantic

Great Lakes  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic  South South Atlantic   All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1TCNJ16-3 99.70.6660.607
2Messiah17-5 99.60.6940.667
3Lebanon Valley19-3 99.40.6640.598
4Montclair State16-3 99.00.6320.562
5Rowan15-6 98.60.6510.630
6Elizabethtown16-6 98.10.6160.579
7Juniata16-5 98.00.6160.567
8Widener13-5 97.80.5860.541
9King's19-4 97.70.5690.483
10Alvernia18-5 97.40.5820.516
11Eastern16-5 97.30.5930.536
12William Paterson12-7 97.00.5660.544
13Kean9-7 96.70.5350.526
14Scranton11-9 96.60.5220.513
15FDU13-8 96.30.5520.529
16Wesley13-9 95.90.5350.516
17Susquehanna5-12 95.70.5360.617
18Wilkes9-8 95.70.5150.510
19Misericordia12-7 95.70.5240.488
20DeSales9-9 95.60.5170.523
21Delaware Valley10-8 95.50.4840.461
22Richard Stockton7-11 95.50.5140.556
23Ramapo7-10 95.40.5110.545
24Stevens11-8 95.20.4750.440
25Philadelphia Bible9-10 95.20.4990.508
26Neumann8-10 94.80.4910.507
27Albright6-12 94.70.4620.505
28Moravian4-15 94.40.4810.571
29Drew3-13 94.20.4680.562
30Gwynedd-Mercy7-11 94.10.4420.460
31Cabrini7-9 94.00.4570.463
32Manhattanville3-16 93.90.4380.531
33Marywood5-11 93.10.4130.447
34Arcadia3-14 92.50.4120.490
35Immaculata4-13 92.30.3890.441
36Saint Vincent3-11 91.50.3780.432
37Cedar Crest2-15 91.40.3770.464
38Rosemont0-12 89.50.3270.436

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home